NASM CNC Study Guide
Post 4 of 25
- NASM CNC Study Guide Home
- NASM CNC Chapter 1
- NASM CNC Chapter 2
- NASM CNC Chapter 3
- NASM CNC Chapter 4
- NASM CNC Chapter 5
- NASM CNC Chapter 6
- NASM CNC Chapter 7
- NASM CNC Chapter 8
- NASM CNC Chapter 9
- NASM CNC Chapter 10
- NASM CNC Chapter 11
- NASM CNC Chapter 12
- NASM CNC Chapter 13
- NASM CNC Chapter 14
- NASM CNC Chapter 15
- NASM CNC Chapter 16
- NASM CNC Chapter 17
- NASM CNC Chapter 18
- NASM CNC Chapter 19
- NASM CNC Chapter 20
- NASM CNC Chapter 21
- NASM CNC Chapter 22
- NASM CNC Chapter 23
- NASM CNC Chapter 24
If you have yet to sign up for the NASM CNC, here is a special discount that my website visitors get.
Post 4 of 25 in the NASM CNC Study Guide
- Describe the reasons for using an evidence-based practice.
- Know the differences in methodology and basic science principles.
- Be able to explain the scientific method.
- Define the scientific process.
- Compare all of the research methods.
- Determine if a source is reliable.
- Analyze research findings and formulate your position in nutrition science.
Science and Evidence-Based Practice
Science is the body of knowledge and also the process that we use to obtain the knowledge itself. Science is simply a method for getting objective truths.
We use the process known as the scientific method. This is the method that begins with a formulation of a hypothesis. The hypothesis is a possible explanation for some problem or set of observed things. The scientist then designs some experiments to test that formulated hypothesis. If the experiments fail, then this would not be used to explain the hypothesis and the hypothesis would need to be changed and then retested. If the experiment passes and back the hypothesis, then it would be used as a working model for that idea.
Evidence based practice means that something uses this three-pronged approach to work with their clients that consists of these three things:
- The weight of the evidence from scientific research.
- Observations made in the field.
- The needs and preferences of individual clients.
A large part of the process of science is testing the hypothesis. Scientific studies are the main way in which we do this.
Instead of scientists proving what is true, they actually just narrow down what may be true.
Predictions result from the hypothesis and these will be proved true or not true through testing. This is through experiments or just gathering some data.
The Accumulation of Evidence
Here, the phrase of science being “most likely true” starts to resonate. This is because all testing is an accumulation of evidence. The failures and the successful experiments. The more evidence we have available, the more likely something is to be true.
A theory is a hypothesis, or some set of hypotheses in which a large amount of evidence has been brought together to make something extremely probable.
The Hierarchy of Evidence
In order from the best evidence to the least reliable:
- Systematic reviews and the meta-analyses of RCTs.
- Peer reviewed editorials and other opinions from experts
- Non peer reviewed media like anecdote and tradition
- Non-peer-reviewed media
- This includes media consisting of news reports, magazines, documentaries, and television shows. There exist many biases, inaccuracies, and bad information all throughout.
Anecdote = an account of someone’s experience
Peer-Reviewed Editorials and Expert Opinions
This is an opinion piece found inside of a scientific journal. It may have gone through some form of peer review and it is based on scientific evidence, but all together it is still only an opinion piece.
This is research where the researcher observes ongoing behaviors in order to determine if correlations exist. Correlations found will not equal causation. so, here we find correlation and not cause and effect.
Randomized Control Trials
This is a form of scientific trial or study that has participants randomly being assigned different groups. One group is the group being tested, while the other is the group for control. This is random in order to prevent biases occurring.
We make use of placebos here. This is when someone is given something in the control group that is thought to have an effect but doesn’t. it works to prevent the bias.
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of RCTs
Systematic reviews are reviews in which scientists have gotten together and gathered all of the research on one topic and evaluated it based upon some predefined rules and criteria.
Meta-analyses are statistical analyses of a group of studies for assessing overall weights of evidence presented.
Strengths and Limitations of Major Types of Research
Strengths and Limitations of the Observational Designs
These studies allow for the examination of large populations over long time periods. They work to look at the possible associations that happen over these long periods of time. they also allow for hypotheses to be generated that can be looked at within RCTs.
These are still unable to look at the cause and effect of what they are observing.it is possible for scientists to try to control a lot of confounders in statistics, but they cannot control them all when looking back in time.
Exclusive PTP Offers
|Gold Standard Cert||Most Popular Cert||A Good Option
|Best Study Materials||Best online PT course||The Top PT Software
Strengths and Limitations of Interventional Designs
The main strength of interventional designs is them allowing the demonstration of causes and effects. The scientist are able to control most variables they cannot control in the observational research. It is also possible to explore mechanistic explanations for observed effects.
This degree of control also plays a role as a limitation. This is, the study might not be representing the conditions within the real world. So, we would then limit the external validity.
One more major imitation is the examination of limited variables at one time.
They may also be limited by having less subjects or even done with very little time.
Evaluating Sources of Information
Peer-reviewed Scientific Journals
These journals are compiled research papers, editorials, and some other types of academic writing. These will go through the process of peer-review. This is the critical evaluation of the study by other scientists.
Types of peer-reviewed journal articles:
- Narrative reviews
- Individual studies
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Position stands and scientific consensus statements
- High quality Non-peer Reviewed Sources of Information
- These can be great sources, but they do have a higher risk of bias and error.
These resources include:
- Academic textbooks that were recently published
- Pubic heath websites from universities
- Podcast interviews with primary researchers
- International health websites
- Questionable or Poor non-peer reviewed sources of information
- Caution is always warranted when getting info from these.
- These include:
- Popular media
- Testimonials and anecdotes
- Most blogs
Scientific Consensus: How the Scientific Community Changes
Sometimes the studies can contradict one another, but this is a natural piece of the scientific process. As time progresses, newer evidence or the use of new tools will help this natural process and the scientific theories will be backed by more evidence.
Science: Shades of Grey, Not Black and White
Conclusions made in science are tentative and based upon differing degrees of certainty that we base on the weight of the evidence presented. So, science rarely ever will give use an answer that is black and white. The more evidence we have for something, the darker grey I will become. A theory isn’t even a pure statement either, just a darker form of grey.
The topic of nutrition is notably a very complex topic when it comes to evidence and the weight of proof.